安德里希谈判罚：丘库埃梅卡倒地的方式对我来说不是正常摔倒（安德里希评点球判罚：我认为丘库埃梅卡的倒地并非正常摔倒）

Clarifying the laws of soccer

To avoid speculation, I think we should frame things generically and ask for match details. Let’s cover Law 12: a direct free kick or penalty is awarded for careless, reckless, or excessive force in a challenge, including tripping, pushing, or holding. It seems that even attempting to trip can still result in a direct free kick if contact occurs. The Laws of the Game clarify that an attempt counts even without contact.Analyzing penalties and simulation

For a penalty inside the area, a direct free kick offense triggers a penalty, but referees really need to see an actual foul rather than a simulation. The Laws suggest considering the nature and intensity of contact without needing a consequence. Also, a referee might caution for exaggeration, which might indicate unsporting behavior.

With VAR, a clear mistake must be evident for penalties to be overturned. If an attacker initiates contact by kicking a defender intentionally, it often results in no penalty. We could also discuss fall mechanics and use different angles for analysis.Drafting social media content

I’ll offer to draft a short Chinese social post that summarizes Andrich's quote along with a balanced perspective. Alternatively, I could create a longer analysis of the incident with bullet points and even a checklist for evaluating similar incidents. It might be helpful to mention typical phrases used in Chinese football media too. I could also ask if the user wants more information, the original source, or an analysis from a rules perspective, all concise and clear!